Monday, July 18, 2011

Potatoes In Norway = Lefse!

Continuing on a previous theme of family heritage, here's a little history about potatoes in Norway. Norway is where my paternal grandmother and her family hailed from.

“The potato, native to the Andes Mountains of Peru and Bolivia, was introduced to Europe by the Spaniards in the 16th century, and to Norway in the mid-1700s.

“At first, some though potatoes to be poisonous. But by the early 1800s, Norwegians knew what to do with a potato. In fact, potatoes caught on so well that by 1835 potato crops were six times larger than they had been in 1809. Virtually every home had its own potato patch, even the homes in the Arctic Circle. Poor soil and a short growing season didn’t affect the highly nutritious potato, and the yield from potatoes was four or five time better than from wheat or rye.

“The potato became a family’s insurance policy against starvation where grains could not grow because of climate or bad weather. It was eaten as is and was a fine extender in soups, salads, and daily breads such as lefse.

“The acceptance and then dependence on the potato contributed to overpopulation in the 1800s, which eventually contributed to migration to America. [The Irish Potato Famine of 1845-1852 also affected Norway, although not as greatly. Many Norwegians, dependant on potatoes, moved to America during this period.] From 1800 to 1865, the Norwegian population nearly doubled to more than 1.7 million. The economy was generally good, there was peace, there was the discovery of the smallpox vaccination and improvement in sanitary conditions, and potatoes and protein-rich herring became staple foods for poor people. Thus, people lived longer and the population boomed, pushing people out of crowded areas to northern Norway, where land was still available and fishing was good, and to America.

“Later, during German occupation of Norway in World War II, the potato again was important, according to Bitten and Torbjorn. In Norway, a potato cake-life lefse called lompe ‘kept us alive,’ said Bitten. ‘We very much lived on potatoes then. I tell you, there was not much food. What food there was, the Germans used for the troops. The Germans would take fresh fish, and the stores and restaurants would get the rotten fish.’

“‘But during the occupation we could buy potatoes,’ she continued, ‘and we knew so many ways of using potatoes. We couldn’t buy much milk or butter or margarine – or a decent flour. The flour we could buy was so heavy. You’d bake bread, and the outside was hard and crusty and the inside just a lump of dough.’”

Excerpt taken from:

Legwold, Gary. The Last Word on Lefse: Heartmarming stories and recipes too! Cambridge, MN: Adventure Publications, 1992. Print.

Lefse, a Norwegian flatbread typically made from potatoes, is a delicacy for many Norwegian-Americans today and is often baked during the Thanksgiving and Christmas holidays even though it was such a staple back in Norway. There are many different types of lefse. Some are hard and crispy, others are soft and pliable. Most lefse are fairly thin, but some thicker versions are served as cake. There are just as many ways to eat lefse. The most common way is to spread it with butter, sprinkle it with sugar (and maybe some cinnamon), roll it up, and eat it. It can also be rolled around fish or sausages, slathered with jam, turned into a breakfast burrito, or eaten plain. Most Norwegian-Americans love lefse and those who live in the upper Midwest and Pacific Northwest are lucky enough to be able to buy it in stores. Those of us who live in other parts of the United States either have to make it ourselves, buy it online (if possible), travel thousands of miles to find it, or go without.

We went without lefse for many years in our family. Grandma didn't want to make it because she couldn't get it 'just right' the way her mom used to. But it's so hard, impossible actually, to find in stores around here. I think I may just teach myself how to make it.

End of an Era

So what's my excuse of not posting a blog for the 8th week of class (July 11th)? I was witnessing history without a computer!!!

On July 8th, at approximately 11:29 EDT Space Shuttle Atlantis launched from Kennedy Space Center in Florida on its final mission - and I was there!

The plans to go had been in the works for months and as the day approached and I checked the forecasts in Florida, things weren't looking so good. Due to thunderstorms in the area, there was a 70% change the launch was going to be scrubbed. But we (my dad and I) went anyway and I'm so glad we did.

We made it to Florida by the skin of our teeth - We arrived at SFO 45 minutes before our fight was supposed to depart and didn't get ourselves checked in for another 5 minutes. The desk agent scolded us, pretty much asked for a tip in order to make sure our bag got on the plane with us, and then told us to RUN! We made it to our gate just as our boarding group was being called and my dad finally stopped to put his shoes back on. But our adventure didn't end there. Our plane waited in line for takeoff for 40 minutes! That wouldn't have bothered us so much if we'd had more than a 40 minute connection in Denver. The pilot was able to make up some time in the air, but we still landed in Denver 30 minutes late and we didn't have boarding passes for our next flight. As soon as we set foot in the Denver terminal we rushed to our next flight. The gate agent saw us coming with seat vouchers in hand, said that they'd been waiting for us, and handed us our boarding passes. I'm not even sure he checked the names to make sure we were the right people. Phew!!! We were finally on our way to Florida now the only uncertainty was whether the shuttle would launch or not.

As we boarded our tour bus at 3:00 a.m. the next morning there was still no guarantee that the launch was a "go". Lightning storms were making their way through the area and there had been some strikes near the launch pad. We arrived at Kennedy Space Center at 5:30 a.m. with thousands of other people and the skies were still clouded over. We kept our fingers crossed and proceeded through the metal detectors and on to the entrance. Dad and I wandered the grounds for the next 5 hours before finally picking a spot to sit and watch the launch. Having never been there, we didn't really know where the shuttle was so we just pointed ourselves in the same direction everyone else was facing.

Around 11 a.m., the launch was still uncertain. We all waited with bated breath. About 15 minutes later a voice over the loudspeaker told us that the launch was a go and the crowd erupted in a giant cheer. So many people were on their phones that I couldn't get a text message sent off to my sister. As the minutes ticked by, cameras were readied and people claimed their spots. We listened to the pre-countdown countdown over the loudspeaker and watching the final preparations taking place via the jumbo-tron. 3 minutes and counting...2 minutes and counting...1 minute and counting...30 seconds and counting...and then silence for about 2 and a half minutes. The shuttle was still on the launchpad and the crowd was silent.

Whatever happened, they fixed it quickly and began the 30 second countdown again. Then 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1...and we all watched the sky hoping we were looking in the right direction. I glanced over my shoulder at the jumbo-tron to watch the SRB's ignite and see the shuttle lift away from the platform, then my eyes went back to the horizon ahead of me. And then we saw it...off to the left of where we'd been hoping it would come up. A lady dove in front of me and I had to jostle around to keep the shuttle in my viewfinder as I caught myself from falling over. And then, for some ridiculous reason, I decided to take a picture instead of video. I stopped the video and hit the shutter just as the shuttle disappeared into the clouds!!!

Here's the video I did get...wait for it:




And here's the picture I stopped the video to take...DUMB!



And here's one I got of the smoke plume a couple minutes after lift off...


















Atlantis's 12 day mission STS-135 comes to an end this week. The hatches have been closed separating the space station crew from the shuttle crew and tomorrow morning the shuttle will leave the space station for the final time. It is scheduled to make a pre-dawn landing at Kennedy Space Center on Wednesday morning. For more information about the shuttle program and this final mission, visit NASA.gov.


Go Atlantis!!!



Somewhat Morbid

I had a great time interviewing my grandfather over the 4th of July weekend. He didn't open up about his life as much as I hoped he would, but he did share some things with me I'd never heard before (which wasn't hard to do because I haven't heard much).

One of the things I asked him was about my heritage on his side. He's 50 percent German and 50 percent English mutt. :) He laughed at me when I asked him if he remembered his parents names and how to spell them. (In hindsight, it probably was a silly question to ask, but he is 90 after all.) His dad's name was George Henry Butts and his mom's was Matilda Franciska Riemenschneider. What a mouthful!

I started snooping around on the internet after he left to see if I could come up with some more family history - a long shot, but why not give it a try. I searched for his parents' names and then town where he was born - Litchfield, Illinois - and low and behold, I got some hits!

The most fascinating to me was what I found on findagrave.com (hence the 'Somewhat Morbid' title). Not only did I find pictures of his parents' (my great-grandparents') headstones, but ones for my great-great grandparents and my great-great-great grandparents! How cool is that?!? Hours before I hadn't even known who they were really and all of a sudden I was looking at their graves in Illinois! Here's a link to my great-great-great Grandpa Riemenscheider's grave: http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GRid=23723633 His name was John Riemenschneider and, according to family stories, he used to split logs with Abraham Lincoln!

Apparently someone bought a family plot in the cemetery years ago and that's why they're all buried there together. Grandpa's little sister Helen Elaine is buried there too. She died when she was just 6 days old according to her headstone (Grandpa said she was 6 weeks old, but memory fades with age right?). I still wonder why she died or if the family even knew why. Grandpa didn't know or remember.

I was so excited to find the graves of my "great" family members I went looking for some from the other side of my family. Sadly, I couldn't find any. My dad says he knows where his grandmother is buried just down the road in Los Altos, but her headstone didn't show up. Perhaps I should go visit and take a picture to submit to findagrave.com.

I apologize for the somewhat morbid topic, but maybe it will inspire you to do a little searching of your own.

Saturday, June 25, 2011

Relections on Haiti

I give props to the slaves of Haiti for going after their independence and getting it. It’s pretty awesome that such a tiny nation was the site of the only successful slave revolution in the world. But did they really get what they were after? Was freedom all they really wanted or did they want to remain the prosperous, wealthy colony that they were? Our book says that Saint Domingue, what Haiti was formerly called, was widely regarded as the richest colony in the world and produced some 40 percent of the world’s sugar and perhaps half of its coffee. I was honestly shocked when I read that. I’ve been to Haiti and seen firsthand the utter poverty in which many of the Haitians live, especially now. It’s hard for me to picture that tiny nation as ever being hugely prosperous. What were the plantations like in the 1700’s? Did they resemble American plantations or were they more rustic like the Haiti of today?




This family struggles to support itself and feed its children. They press sugar cane to make molasses for exportation. It will be used to make rum in the Dominican Republic and then taxed highly as an import back to Haiti. This is where they live…

and this …

is how they press the cane.

Haitians still produce small amounts of food for their own needs with a little bit left to sell at the local market – like this …

but many, many families cannot afford to feed their children. Some of them do get fed though, thanks to nutrition centers set up near some towns. Many of the centers, like the ones in Pignon, are run by local missionaries and feed hundreds of children each week.

These boys are sharing one serving so they can take leftovers back to their families.

But the nation as a whole is incredibly poor and has been – largely as a result of the slave revolution of 1791.

On another note, I found it interesting that revolutions have caused many nations to essentially flip-flop. The United States, originally colonies of “leftover” Englishmen, became wealthy, industrialized, and stable after its revolution. Many Latin American countries, initially wealthy and sophisticated colonies, became underdeveloped, unstable, and dependent on foreign investment after their revolutions. The same goes for Haiti. It was once a global, economic power and now it’s the poorest country in the Western Hemisphere. Would they be where they are today if they hadn’t had such a brutal and bitter revolution?

Monday, June 20, 2011

YAY!!! A new topic!

Frankly, I’m getting pretty sick of Strayer and how repetitive he is. It seems like every chapter just rehashes a previous one and I have seriously lost interest. My mind wanders while I read now and forcing myself to pay attention isn’t helping. Rereading paragraphs I’ve let my mind wander on just makes the task of reading even more tedious. But…we’ve finally come to a somewhat new topic – religion and science. This chapter held my attention a little more than the ones from the recent past. Maybe that’s because it made my blood boil within the first paragraph. I get so frustrated when I hear people use the separation of church and state argument. In my studies I’ve always learned that separation of church and state meant that the state (government) didn’t get to dictate how or what people worshiped. They didn’t get to impose their beliefs on the public. That’s one of the things our founding fathers were frustrated with in England – the state church and its authority in political matters. In my opinion, our government is doing the same thing. They deny us the right to express ourselves on public property and force their atheistic/agnostic beliefs on us through our education system. Why is it wrong to teach multiple points of view? The prologue of our book says that many creation stories exist. The Navajo believed the world was created by Holy People who lived underground and were forced to the surface by a flood and created man and women out of ears of corn. The Greeks thought an original Cosmic Egg gave birth to the deities of Earth and Sky who then created earth and its living creatures. Ancient Hebrews believed that God brought order to the chaos and created light and dark, earth, and all living creatures. What makes this last story so scary to our government? Why can we teach other stories of creation and not this one? Why is Christianity the main religion that provokes the separation of church and state argument? It’s frustrating and interesting all the same.

Sunday, June 5, 2011

8...9...10

Chapter 8

Chapter 8 begins with a quotation from the New York Times in 2003. In this quote, the journalist is describing the idea of building a paved highway “from the spot where Europe kisses the tip of this continent into the heart of sub-Saharan Africa.” She (for some reason I assume it’s a she although I don’t really know why) writes as though this a novel idea, as if no one has ever traveled through Europe and into Africa before. Does she know anything of history? Has she never heard of trade and trade routes? Exchange among distant peoples from far-away lands is nothing new. Global economy is not a new idea although many think it is. 1500-500 years ago, long-distance trade played a significant role in shaping whole societies. For many, economic self-sufficiency was diminished as they began producing specialized products for trade. Local religions and cultures were also affected as was the health of many people. Initially, trading by land was expensive. Camel caravans could only carry so much and so they frequently carried whatever would bring them the most profit – luxury products, such as silk, destined for an elite and wealthy market. Transportation costs were much lower on the sea. Ships could carry much larger and heavy loads so they eventually carried goods destined for a mass market like textiles, pepper, timber, rice, sugar, and wheat.

Chapter 9

The idea of China being the next superpower has, quite frankly, freaked out several people that I know. They are unfamiliar with most of China’s history and know more of, as our book says, the weak and dependent country that existed during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. But we owe a lot to the Chinese (and the nations that influenced them) – agricultural and industrial advances, red light districts, woodblock and movable type printing, printed books, navigational technologies, and gunpowder to name a few. Thankfully, foot binding went out of style during the twentieth century and won’t likely make a comeback for a while.

Of particular interest to me in this chapter was the discussion about China’s relationship with its nomadic northern neighbors. China wasn’t a self-contained nation as is largely thought. Even though they built the Great Wall to keep the nomads out, they relied upon them heavily at times and the tribute system they created didn’t quite work the way they said it did. Created to make non-Chinese authorities acknowledge Chinese superiority and their own subordination, the tribute system frequently found emperors “paying heavily for protection from nomadic incursion.” In other words, the Chinese were paying the nomads off – bribing them for their own security. It made me think…how often do we do this same sort of thing in our lives today and, because of our own arrogance and pride, still think that we’re the ones in control?

Chapter 10

As a Christian I believe that Jesus was both God and man. I have no idea what the beliefs of Nestorianism were, other than what our book tells me, but I’m surprised that European Christians thought them heretics for their belief that Jesus “had two quite distinct natures, one human and one divine.” That sentence makes me wonder who the Europeans and Nestorians thought Jesus was. Perhaps I’ll find out as I read some more…Nope didn’t find out anything more about that. I did have an interesting discussion about it with some friends though. One idea brought up was that the word distinct, meaning not the same or separate, may have caused the issue for the Europeans.

Chapter 10 didn’t really strike me all that much. It basically talked about the spread of Christianity and the unifications and divisions it created over several centuries. I am starting to get a little annoyed with how our book is organized though. I really wish it would stop jumping back and forth in history and just present things in a chronological manner. Perhaps I’m just more of a linear thinker than the author is.

Monday, May 30, 2011

Chapter 6...

Chapter 6: Eurasia Social Hierarchies (500 BCE – 500 CE)

Society and State in Classical China

· Chinese society was unique in the ancient world in the extent to which it was shaped by the actions of the state.

· Chinese state officials represented the cultural elite of Chinese civilization for more than 2,000 years.

· This class originated when early Chinese rulers tried to find administrators loyal to the central state rather than to their own families or regions.

· Confucius had long advocated selecting officials on the basis of merit and personal morality rather than birth or wealth.

Chinese Classes:

· An Elite of Officials

o In 124 BCE, Emperor Wu Di established an academy where potential officials were trained as scholars. They studied history, literature, art, and math with an emphasis on Confucian teaching and were then subjected to written examinations in order to be selected as officials. This system of examination lasted until the early twentieth century.

§ The academy enrolled about 30,000 students by the end of the Han dynasty.

§ Although open to all men, the system favored those who were wealthy enough to provide the years of schooling necessary to pass the exams. Proximity to the capital and family connections also helped.

§ It was possible for a bright young commoner to be sponsored by others thus giving him a chance at schooling and examination. In this manner, the system provided a modest measure of social mobility in an otherwise quite hierarchical society.

§ In later dynasties, the system grew to be even more elaborate and became an enduring and distinguishing feature of Chinese civilization.

o Those who were selected entered a realm of enormous prestige and privilege. They wore robes and other finery according to their rank. Senior officials rode around in carriages.

o An imperial edict of 144 BCE stated, “Officials are the leaders of the populace and it is right and proper that the carriages they ride in and the robes they wear should correspond to the degrees of their dignity.”

· The Landlord Class

o When China was unified around 210 BCE most of the land was held by peasant farmers. By the first century BCE, social and economic pressures had created a class of large landowners and impoverished peasants found it necessary to sell their lands.

o Accumulation of land was unsuccessfully opposed by state officials.

§ Landlords were often able to avoid paying taxes thus decreasing tax revenue for the state and putting the tax burden on the peasants.

§ Some landlords kept their own military forces to challenge the authority of the emperor.

o Wang Mang, a high court official on the Han dynasty, usurped the throne in 8 CE and launched a series of startling reforms.

§ He ordered the great private estates to be nationalized and divided up among the landless, government loans to be given to peasant families, limits on land ownership, and an end to private slavery.

§ His reforms were hard to enforce and opposition led to his collapse and assassination in 23 CE.

o Referred to as “scholar-gentry” they benefitted both from the wealth generated by their estates and from the power and prestige accompanied with membership in the official elite. Many had lavish homes in both urban and rural areas.

· Peasants

o The vast majority of China’s population throughout history has been peasants.

o Viewed as the solid, productive backbone of the country

o The peasants were an exploited class, but they were also honored and celebrated in the official ideology of the state.

o Some peasants own enough land to support their families and make a small profit, some barely survive.

o Landlords, the state, and nature can make life difficult.

§ Famine, floods, drought, hail, pests, etc. wreak havoc on crops without warning.

§ State authorities demand taxes, labor on public projects, and military service for young men.

§ Many peasants had to sell their land to large landowners during the Han dynasty and work as sharecroppers – rents could be more than ½ of the crop.

o Periodic peasant rebellions have punctuated Chinese history over the past 2,000 years.

§ Wandering bands of peasants joined forces near the end of the second century CE – the Yellow Turban Rebellion emerged partially provoked by flooding and epidemics.

· Named for the yellow scarves worn around their heads

· Swelled to 360,000 armed members by 184 CE and found leaders, organization, and ideology in a popular form of Daoism.

§ Rebellions, though suppressed by the Han dynasty military, devastated the economy, weakened the state, and contributed to the overthrow of the dynasty a few decades later.

§ Rebellions were often expressed in religious terms

· Merchants

o Viewed as unproductive, making a shameful profit from selling the work of others (by the elite). Stereotyped as greedy, luxury loving, and materialistic. Seen as a social threat, as their ill-gained wealth impoverished others, deprived the state of needed revenues, and fostered resentments.

o State authorities periodically tried to keep merchants under control by…

§ Forbidding them to wear silk, carry arms, and ride horses

§ Forbidding them to hold public office

§ Loan large sums of money to the state

§ Limiting opportunities for profit through state monopolies on salt, iron, and alcohol

o Merchants often prospered despite discrimination against them

§ Some gained respectability by purchasing land and educating their sons for elite exams

§ Many had back-door relationships with state officials who found them useful

Class and Caste in India

· India’s social organization shared certain broad features with that of China.

o Birth determined social status for most people; little social mobility was available; sharp distinctions and great inequalities characterized social life; religious or cultural traditions defined inequalities as natural, eternal, and ordained by the gods.

· India’s social system differed from China in several ways:

o It gave priority to religious status and ritual purity

o It divided society into vast numbers of distinct social groups

o It defined these social groups far more rigidly with even less opportunity for social mobility than in China

· Caste comes from the Portuguese word casta which means “race” or “purity of blood.”

Caste as Varna

· Castes may have evolved from a racially defined encounter between light-skinned Aryan invaders and the darker-skinned native people.

o It certainly grew out of the interaction of many culturally diverse people on the South Asian peninsula.

o Economic and social differences promote the inequalities and growth of the system.

o Notions of race seem less important than economic specialization.

· Around 500 BCE, a clear belief existed that society was forever divided in four great classes known as varna.

o Everyone was born into and remained in one of these classes.

§ Top class – Brahmins, priests who could ensure the proper functioning of the world

§ Ksatriya – warriors and rulers who protect society

§ Vaisya – commoners who cultivate the land

§ Sudras – native peoples in subordinate positions, servants

o Top three classes regarded as pure Aryans and called “twice-born” – they had a physical birth and an initiation into their respective classes.

· According to varna theory, the four classes were formed from the body of the god Purusha and were therefore eternal and changeless.

o In reality, there has been considerable social change to the structure:

§ The top two classes were frequently in conflict over who ranked highest – the Brahmins slowly emerged as the victors

§ Tribal peoples were absorbed into Aryan classes as civilization expanded

§ Tribal medicine men entered the Brahmin varna and warrior groups entered the Ksatriya

§ Vaisya varna evolved into a business class with a prominent place for merchants

§ The Sudra varna became peasant farmers

§ A new category of “untouchables” emerged below the Sudra varna and consisted of people who did work considered to be most polluted and unclean

Caste as Jati

· Another set of social distinctions, deriving largely from specific occupations, arose as the varna system took shape.

· Over time, these groups, known as jatis, blended with the varna system to create classical India’s unique caste-based society.

· The many thousands of jatis became the primary cell of India’s social life, but each was associated with one of the varnas.

o Each varna was divided into many separate jatis, or subcastes.

o Each jati was ranked in a hierarchy known to all.

· The social position of each jati was clearly defined.

o Marriage and eating together were only permitted only within an individual’s own jati

o Each jati was assigned a particular set of duties, rules, and obligations to fulfill

· Ideas of ritual purity and pollution were associated with each caste group. Members of higher castes were in danger of becoming polluted if touched by an untouchable. Thus, untouchables were forbidden to use the same wells, temples, etc as the higher-caste peoples.

· Hindu notions further supported the inequality present in the caste system.

o Your caste of birth generally reflected your good or bad deeds (karma) of a previous life.

o Rebirth in a higher caste depended on how faithfully you performed your caste duties (dharma) in the present life.

· Each jati had the authority to expel members who violated its rules.

· As caste restrictions tightened, it became virtually impossible for individuals to raise their social status during their lifetimes, but it was possible for an entire jati to raise their standing in the local hierarchy of several generations.

o Acquiring land or wealth, adopting behaviors of a higher caste, and finding an “overlooked” ancestor of a higher caste were some ways that a jati could raise its social standing.

The Functions of Caste

· The localized nature of the jati focused the loyalties of most people and weakened the appeal or authority of larger all-Indian states. This is one of the reasons India seldom experienced an empire that encompassed the entire subcontinent.

· Castes provided a modest measure of social security and support. They cared for widows, orphans, and the destitute. Even low-ranking jatis had the right to payments from the social superiors whom they served.

· Caste provided a means of accommodating migrating and invading peoples. Its honeycomb-like structure allowed people from various cultures to find a place within Indian civilization while retaining some of their unique identity.

· The caste system facilitated the exploitation of the poor by the wealthy and powerful.

Slavery in the Classical Era: The Case of the Roman Empire

· There are several theories associated with the beginning of slavery:

o One scholar suggested that the early domestication of animals provided the model for enslaving people.

o War, patriarchy, and the notion of private property also contributed to the growth of slavery.

o Early records suggest that women captured in war were the first slaves.

o Patriarchal societies based on “ownership” may have suggested the possibility of using other people as slaves.

Slavery and Civilization

· Slavery generally meant ownership by a master, the possibility of being sold, working without pay, and the status of an outsider.

· For many it meant “social death” – they usually lacked any rights or personal identity

· Slavery was a long established tradition even by the time of Hammurabi (around 1750 BCE)

· Virtually all civilizations practiced some form of slavery

· Slavery varied considerably over time and place.

o In classical Greece and Rome, slaves were often emancipated for a multitude of reasons.

o Children sometimes inherited the slave status of their parents. In the Aztec Empire however, they were considered free.

o Types of labor also varied from working for the state in high positions to toiling in the fields.

· Slavery was minor in China with only about 1% of the population being slaves.

o Convicts and their families were among the earliest slaves in the Han dynasty.

o Indebted peasants sometimes sold their children into slavery.

· Indian slavery was more restrained than that of other ancient civilizations

o Secular law offered some protection for slaves

o Owners were required to provide adequately for them and were forbidden to abandon them in old age.

o Slaves could inherit and own property and earn money in their spare time.

o Masters who raped their slave women were required to set them free and pay compensation.

o Owners were encouraged to free their slaves and slaves were allowed to buy their freedom.

The Making of a Slave Society: The Case of Rome

· Slavery played an immense role in the Mediterranean, or Western, world

o The Greco-Roman world can be described as a slave society with 1/3 (about 60,000) of the population of Athens being enslaved.

§ Aristotle claimed that some people were “slaves by nature” and should be enslaved for their own good

§ Poor households usually had at least one or two female slaves for domestic work and sexual services

§ Although many were granted freedom, they did not become citizens or gain political rights.

o Slavery was a defining element of Roman society

§ By the time of Christ, the Italian heartland of the Roman Empire had about 2-3 million slaves, representing 33% to 40% of the population.

§ Wealthy Romans could own many hundreds or even thousands of slaves

§ Even people of modest means frequently owned two or three slaves

§ Slaves and former slaves might also own slaves

· People could become slaves in numerous ways:

o Many prisoners of war became slaves – In 146 BCE, 55,ooo people were enslaved en masse from Carthage

o Pirates kidnapped people and sold them to slave traders on the island of Delos

o Roman merchants purchased slaves through networks of long-distance commerce

o Natural reproduction provided more slaves as children of slaves were slaves themselves. These “home-born” slaves had more prestige and were thought to be less troublesome than others.

o Abandoned or exposed children could legally become the slaves of anyone who rescued them

· Slavery in Rome was extremely diverse. It did not identify with a particular racial or ethnic group.

o Romans regarded their slaves as “barbarians” and came to think of certain peoples, such as Asiatic Greeks, Syrians, and Jews, as slaves by nature.

· Christianity did little to deter slavery

o Teachings there held that slaves should be “submissive to their masters with all fear…” and that slavery was God’s punishment for sin.

· Slavery was entrenched throughout the Roman economy

o No occupation was off-limits except military service

o No distinctions existed between jobs for free and jobs for slaves, they frequently labored side by side

o Many were skilled artisans, teachers, doctors, entertainers, actors, public servants, and gladiators

o Slaves were represented among the highest and most prestigious occupations and in the lowest and most degraded.

· Rights of slaves

o Owners were supposed to provide the necessities of life but the price was absolute subjection to the will of the master

o Slaves lacked all rights and could not legally marry

o Any money or possessions they accumulated legally belonged to their masters and could be seized at any time

o If a slave murdered his master, law demanded the lives of ALL the victim’s slaves

o Freeing of slaves was common, and in the Roman Empire, freedom was accompanied by citizenship.

Resistance and Rebellion

· Slaves responded to enslavement in many ways

o Most did what they needed to do to survive

o Many Roman prisoners of war chose to commit mass suicide rather than become slaves

o Once enslaved, many resorted to “weapons of the weak” – theft, sabotage, working poorly, pretending illness

o Fleeing to the anonymous crowds of a city or to remote rural areas

o Owners were occasionally murdered

o Rebellion

§ Most famous uprising occurred in 73 BCE when Spartacus, a slave gladiator, led 70 other slaves from a gladiator school. For 2 years they set Italy ablaze and their numbers grew to perhaps 120,000. They captured slave owners, crucified some, and made others fight as gladiators. They eventually succumbed to the Roman legions and many were nailed to crosses along the Apian Way.

§ Nothing of this scale happened again in the Western world of slavery until the Haitian revolution in the 1790s.

§ Roman slave rebellions never attempted to end slavery altogether, they just sought freedom for themselves

Comparing Patriarchies of the Classical Era

· Every human community has created a gender system and sought to define masculine and feminine roles

o Since the First Civilizations, those defined have been patriarchal – dominance of men over women

o Inequalities of gender are more widespread than slavery

o Men had legal and property rights that women did not

o Public life was a male domain, women remained in domestic settings

o Polygamy was accepted and men could claim the right to regulate their social and sexual lives

o Women were seen as weak and feared as potentially disruptive, thus they required the control and protection of men

o The degree and expression of patriarchy varied from one civilization to the next and changed over time

o In some societies, patriarchy interacted with class to generate, usually, a more restrictive life for upper-class women

A Changing Patriarchy: The Case of China

· During the Han Dynasty, gender issues became more explicitly patriarchal, more clearly defined, and linked to Confucian ideology.

o Patterns of thinking in terms of opposites gained gendered and unequal terms. Yang was superior, viewed as masculine, and related to heaven, rules, strength, rationality, etc. Yin was submissive, viewed as feminine, and related to earth, subjects, weakness, emotion, and darkness.

o The adage “Men go out, women stay in” emphasized the public and political roles of men.

o The idea of “three obediences” suggests that a women is subordinate first to her father, then to her husband, and finally to her son.

· The female Chinese writer, Ban Zhou, tells of the birth rituals the reinforce a woman’s inferiority

o Baby placed below the bed to show that she is “lowly and weak”

o Baby given a piece of broken pottery to play with to teach her of her duty to be industrious

o Birth was announced to ancestors with an offering saying that she was responsible for continued ancestral worship in the home

· Not all women in classical China were passive, inferior, and submissive

o A few, like emperors’ wives, had considerable political authority

o Writers praised women of virtue as wise counselors to their husbands and fathers

o Mothers of sons were given considerable honor for producing the next heirs

o In the upper class, a woman’s dowry was considered her own property and gave her some leverage in her marriage

o A woman’s role in the production of textiles made her labor quite valuable to the family economy

o Wives were distinguished from concubines since they alone could produce heirs

· The collapse of the Han dynasty led to changes in the gender system

o Confucianism was discredited

o Invasion and rule, of small northern states, by pastoral and nomadic peoples loosened the strictness of patriarchy over 5 or 6 centuries

o By the time of the Tang Dynasty (618-907 CE), elite women were capable of handling legal and business affairs. They also rode horses and played polo wearing men’s clothing

§ Tang legal code recognized a married daughter’s right to inherit property from her birth family

o The reign of Empress Wu (690-705 CE), a former concubine and the only woman to ever rule as emperor, further weakened patriarchy. Some of her actions seemed deliberately designed to elevate the status of women.

o Growing popularity of Daoism (dao as “mother”) provided new images and roles for women. Feminine virtues of yielding and passive acceptance were urged.

Contrasting Patriarchies in Athens and Sparta

· Athens, so celebrated for its democracy and philosophical rationalism, offered little to its women, whereas Sparta, often condemned for its militarism and virtual enslavement of helots, provided a somewhat wider scope for the free women of the city.

· In Athens…

o Between 700 & 400 BCE, women experienced growing limitations.

o Women were excluded from public life and had no role whatsoever in council, juries, etc.

o In law, they had to be represented by a guardian, and the proceedings did not even mention them by name, only as someone’s wife or mother.

o Aristotle justified women’s exclusion from public life and their general subordination to men because of their inherent “inadequacy” (inability to produce sperm) and because of their similarities to domesticated animals who need to be ruled.

o Women were respected to remain inside the home

o They generally married in their mid-teens to men 10-15 years older

o Their main function was the management of domestic affairs and the production of sons

o Women could own personal property obtained through dowry, gifts, or inheritance, but land was passed through male heirs.

o Women could only negotiate small contracts – the value had to be less than a bushel of barley

o Aspasia, born to a wealthy family in Miletus who believed in educating its daughters, was the exception in Athens. She was treated as an equal by her partner Pericles and moved freely about the cultured circles in Athens.

· In Sparta…

o Troops remained constantly ready for war to keep the helots in their place. (The helots were the slave-like neighbors of Sparta who vastly outnumbered the free citizens of Sparta.)

o All boys were removed from their families at age 7 to be trained by the state military camps. They remained in training until they were 30.

o Spartan men were warriors above all.

o The military-mindedness of Sparta, strangely enough, offered more freedom and fewer restrictions to women.

o To strengthen their bodies for bearing warrior sons, girls were encouraged to take part in sporting events – sometimes competing in the nude

o Girls’ education was prescribed by the state

o Young women usually married men their own age (18 years) and cut their hair short in a masculine fashion. They were also not segregated or secluded. These actions helped put them on a more equal basis.

o Marriage often began on a trial basis to make sure children could be produced. Divorce and remarriage were readily available if not.

o Women exercised much more authority in the household since the men were gone so frequently.

o Spartan women were severely criticized by other Greek states for immodesty, controlling land estates, and living in luxury.

o Women still lacked formal roles in public life

Reflections: Arguing with Solomon and the Buddha

· What is more impressive – the innovations and changes or the enduring patterns and lasting features of these civilizations?

o Ecclesiastes/King Solomon – “What has been will be again; what has been done will be done again; there is nothing new under the sun.”

o Buddha/“impermanence” – “everything changes; nothing remains without change.”

· Clearly, there were new things under the sun.

o The Greek conquest of the Persian Empire was both novel and unexpected.

o The Roman Empire unified the Mediterranean basin in a single political system.

o Buddhism and Christianity emerged as new, distinct, and universal religious traditions.

o Dynasties, empires, and civilizations, thought to be solidly entrenched (such as the Chinese and Roman), collapsed.

· But, much that was created in the classical era – particularly its social and cultural patterns – has demonstrated an impressive continuity over many centuries.

o China’s scholar-gentry class retained its prominence throughout the ups and downs of changing dynasties.

o India’s caste-based social structure still endures as a way of think and behaving for hundreds of millions of people.

o Slavery was massively revived in Europe’s American colonies after 1500 and remained an important and largely unquestioned part of all civilizations until the 19th century.

o Patriarchy has surely been the most fundamental, long-lasting, and taken-for-granted feature of all civilizations.

§ These assumptions were not effectively challenged until the 20th century.

§ Even so, patriarchy has continued to shape the lives and thinking of the vast majority of humankind.

o Religious and cultural traditions begun during the classical era are still honored and practiced by hundreds of millions in the 21st century.

· Continuity and change alike have long been part of the fabric of history.

Review Questions

1. Compare and contrast the varnas and jatis of classical India’s caste system? Did the caste system effectively include or exclude migrating peoples?

2. Explain how the patriarchal views of Athens differed from those of Sparta. Do you see any similarities between them and the patriarchal views of today? Please explain.

3. How did China’s social structure differ from the caste system of India? How was it similar?

4. Slavery has played a large role in most civilizations. Explain how people came to be slaves in the Roman Empire, what rights they had as slaves, and how they responded to enslavement.